#!/bin/cat $Id: FAQ.Old_Style_Web_Design.txt,v 1.9 2020/12/02 21:38:13 gilles Exp gilles $ This document is also available online at https://imapsync.lamiral.info/FAQ.d/ https://imapsync.lamiral.info/FAQ.d/FAQ.Old_Style_Web_Design.txt ======================================================================= Imapsync and its ugly website style ======================================================================= ======================================================================= Q. Why the imapsync website looks so old fashion? R. Once in a while I receive messages from people complaining about the website style, not that much about the content by the way, as people don't read. I know the imapsync website has a grandmother style, I'm not offended by complaints about it. Here are several reasons it stays like that for now: * I like to do things myself * I am lazy * I like static web. Although you could argue that I do use some dynamic things, like SSI. That's true, I use Server Side Include, aka SSI, denoted by the ".shtml" extention of some files, instead of the classical ".html" extention. It's because I like dynamic web when the dynamic brings something that can't be done easily with static files. * I'm proud to be w3c compliant https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fimapsync.lamiral.info Very very few sites are w3c compliant, it's because nearly all CMS frameworks aren't. Only true crazy people are w3c compliant seekers. I'm one of them. If you know a CMS w3c compliant, tell me, it will be such a crazy news. If you know any web site w3c compliant, tell me, it will be crazy news as well. Update: https://contao.org/ is a CMS and it is w3c compliant! This is astonishing! (Thanks to Markus Rupprecht for this crazy input!) * I prefer to spend more time on the product itself than the showcase * The product is a command line, a fancy website to sell a command line makes more disappointed buyers I agree I could do some sort of A/B experiment and see whether during a month I sell more imapsync on a brand new style B site than the current A one. Besides, don't misunderstand buyers. The surprising thing about complainers is that all are web designers, none of them is a user not in the webdesign branch. I even received some phone call from a buyer saying: "I saw your website and I told to myself: this can't be a fake one, the product must be a good one". Another folk like me: http://keyhut.com/pos.htm (well, not w3c compliant, he is not that mad) So maybe one day...